Capacity (GW)

⚡
--
Total Available (MW)
📊
--
Total Delivered (MW)
📈
--
Utilisation Rate
🏢
--
Data Contributors

Data coverage (contributors)

--
MW capacity (Part 3.2)
--
Delivered MW (Part 3.2)
--
Explicit energy (Part 3.1)
--
Implicit energy (Part 4)

Where fewer than 3 contributors supply a metric, values are shown as ranges to protect confidentiality.

Energy (GWh)

🔋
~650
Total Delivered (GWh)
📤
250-750
Explicit/Managed (GWh)
Range
📥
50-250
Implicit/ToU (GWh)
Range

Flexibility Breakdown

4.6 GW
Turn-Up (Load Increase)
ToU Load Shifting
9.2 GW
Turn-Down (Load Reduction)
DSR & Managed Assets
9.2 GW
Explicit (Managed)
DSR Contracts
4.6 GW
Implicit (ToU Response)
Behavioral Response

Key Findings

Loading dashboard data...

Understanding Turn-Up vs Turn-Down

When Time-of-Use tariffs are included, turn-up capacity appears higher because customers shift load into off-peak periods. This reflects demand flexibility, not new generation. Managed assets are predominantly turn-down (demand reduction).

Turn-Up vs Turn-Down

Turn-up dominated by ToU load shifting; turn-down by managed DSR.

Explicit vs Implicit Flexibility

Explicit = contracted, Implicit = price-responsive behavior.

Energy Flexibility Breakdown (GWh)

Energy metrics derived from contributing aggregators and ToU tariff providers.

Market Context

Smart EV Charging Coverage ⓘ
635,000 smart chargers

Represents significant penetration of the domestic smart charging market. Public chargers (~82k) are additional infrastructure.

Sector Growth (2024) ⓘ
Heat Pumps +75%
EV Chargers +28%
Grid Batteries +45%

Rapid market growth means this baseline will need regular updates to remain current.

Important Caveats
  • Partial coverage: Based on a limited number of contributors; not a full-market total.
  • Capacity definition: MW reflects average daily coincident, deduplicated, peak deliverable capacity (Template section 3.2).
  • Missing MW submissions: Where MW is not provided, capacity is treated as missing rather than inferred from asset counts.
  • Double counting risk: Contributors were asked to use conservative values where assets overlap across markets; residual overlap may remain.
  • Route-to-market coverage: Benchmarks like CM do not cover DFS, many DSO tenders, BM/ancillary services, bilateral routes, or most domestic propositions.

Flexibility by Sector

Flexibility by Asset Group

Asset classes are grouped to improve confidentiality where fewer than 3 contributors provide MW values.

Asset portfolio by group (counts)

Counts reflect contributor-reported portfolio sizes (Template Part 2). Ranges are used where disclosure rules apply.

Domestic Flexibility

-- Available (MW)
N/A Delivered (MW)
View Details →

I&C Flexibility

-- Available (MW)
N/A Delivered (MW)
View Details →
--
Total Capacity (MW)
N/A
Delivery Factor
Phase 2

Domestic Asset Breakdown

About Domestic Flexibility

Domestic flexibility includes smart EV chargers, heat pumps, home batteries, and smart appliances in residential properties. These assets can shift their electricity consumption in response to price signals or grid needs.

--
Total Capacity (MW)
N/A
Delivery Factor
Phase 2

I&C Asset Breakdown

About I&C Flexibility

Industrial and Commercial flexibility includes cold storage facilities, water treatment works, manufacturing processes, commercial HVAC systems, and behind-the-meter batteries at business premises.

Benchmark only. Capacity Market figures are used as an external sense-check and are not added to dashboard totals.
Methods and limitations
Capacity Market values represent de-rated capacity awards for DSR CMUs in Delivery Year 2024/25. Dashboard contributor figures reflect the project study period and follow the dashboard working capacity definition. Expect differences due to definition and time-period mismatch, contributor coverage, and overlaps across services.

Delta vs CM benchmark

Positive delta means contributor totals exceed the CM benchmark (by category). Interpret with care.

CM benchmark by category

CM coverage is strongest for I&C oriented capacity; it under-represents domestic propositions.

Contributor totals vs Capacity Market (DY 2024/25)

Category Contributors (MW) CM benchmark (MW) Delta (MW) Delta (%)
Loading...

Where disclosure rules apply to contributor totals, a range is shown in the tooltip rather than a point estimate.

Sources

    Flexibility Trajectory

    📍
    4.9 GW
    Current Observed
    From 42 contributors
    🎯
    15.4
    Latent Potential (GW)
    If all eligible assets managed
    🚀
    55.2
    2030 Projection (GW)
    51-66 GW range
    🌍
    204
    2050 Projection (GW)
    180-220 GW range

    Latent Potential Methodology

    Latent potential estimates the total GB flexibility if all eligible assets were actively managed. Calculated as: Average flex per managed asset × Total GB deployed assets. These are derived from public deployment data to avoid k-threshold disclosure issues.

    Latent Potential by Asset Class

    Based on public deployment figures from Zapmap, MCS, DESNZ, and RenewableUK.

    Latent Potential Calculations

    Asset Class Managed Sample Avg kW/Asset GB Deployed Latent (GW) Source
    Electric Vehicles 635,000 7 kW 1.8M BEVs 12.6 GW Zapmap, SMMT
    Heat Pumps 80 7 kW 250k 1.75 GW MCS
    Domestic Batteries 19,540 9.2 kW ~50k 0.46 GW DESNZ, MCS
    Total Latent Potential ~15.4 GW

    Future Projections

    Future flexibility projections are based on NESO Future Energy Scenarios 2025 and the Clean Power 2030 Action Plan. Two scenario types are presented: (a) future deployment at today's participation rates, and (b) future if expanded to full market participation.

    Flexibility Potential Trajectory

    Central, high, and low scenarios based on NESO FES 2025.

    2030 Flexibility by Technology

    EV Smart Charging 18 GW 5.5M V2G-capable EVs
    Heat Pumps 8 GW 600k/year by 2028
    Battery Storage 23 GW Grid + domestic
    I&C Flexibility 6 GW Expanded DSR

    Policy Drivers

    ZEV Mandate 80% EV sales by 2030, 100% by 2035
    Heat Pump Target 600k installations/year by 2028
    Clean Power 2030 Decarbonised grid by 2030

    Projection Data Sources

    Important Caveats
    • Latent potential: Derived from public deployment data × average impact, not contributor-specific
    • Future projections: Based on NESO/government scenarios, subject to policy changes
    • Participation rates: Actual participation may differ from modelled scenarios
    • Technology evolution: New technologies may change flexibility landscape

    Data Collection

    Data was collected from energy suppliers, aggregators, and network operators using standardised templates. Each organisation submitted information about their flexible asset portfolios and service participation.

    Data Governance

    To protect commercial confidentiality, all data undergoes statistical disclosure control. Values are only published when 3 or more contributors exist for that metric. This prevents identification of individual organisations.

    k = 3 Minimum contributors per cell

    Range Estimates

    Where fewer than 3 contributors exist for a dimension, we publish range estimates instead of point values. This statistical disclosure approach (used by ONS and Eurostat) protects individual contributors while still providing useful magnitude information.

    5-10 GW = Value falls within this range
    50-100 MW = Value falls within this range

    Ranges are shown in orange on charts. The bar height represents the range midpoint.

    Data Quality

    Contributors: --
    Validation Rate: --%
    Avg Completeness: --%

    External Data Sources

    Market context figures are drawn from publicly available sources:

    Contribute Data

    Want to contribute to future releases of this dashboard? Contact the ADE Data Lab team to learn how your organisation can participate.

    Get in Touch

    Documentation

    For full methodology documentation, data templates, and technical details:

    View Documentation